Big Mac Marke

The End of McDonald’s “BIG MAC”?


Your contact

In its decision of 11 January 2019 the Cancellation Division of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) ruled to revoke McDonald’s European Union trademark for “BIG MAC”. The EUIPO came to the conclusion that McDonald’s had failed to demonstrate the genuine use in respect of the goods and services covered by the registration.

In 1996 McDonald’s filed the trademark “BIG MAC” for various types of edible sandwiches and restaurant businesses in the Nice classes 29, 30 and 42. The trademark has been renewed twice.

Based inter alia on this earlier “BIG MAC” trademark (EU 000 062 638) McDonald’s opposed the “SUPERMAC’S” trademark (EU 012 680 591) in 2014 which had been filed by the Irish company Supermac’s for the almost identical goods and services. The opposition was upheld especially for hamburgers.

Immediately thereafter, in 2017 the year of the 50th anniversary of “BIG MAC”, the Irish company Supermac’s applied for the revocation of the European Union trademark “BIG MAC” based on grounds of lacking genuine use for the continuous period of five years in relation to any of the registered goods and services.

For the proof of use McDonald’s submitted affidavits, advertising material, print screens from its websites all over Europe as well as Wikipedia printouts. Furthermore, McDonald’s claimed that the use in Germany, France and the United Kingdom – as three of the economically most important Member States – should be sufficient to prove that the mark is used in the whole European Union. Besides the use of the trademark for a sandwich should be considered as use for its ingredients likewise.

Supermac’s argued, the trademark “BIG MAC” if at all had been used in relation to a sandwich including beef, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions and a special sauce.

The EUIPO found in its ruling, that according to European law “evidence of use must establish the place, time, extent and nature of use of the contested trade mark for the goods and/or services for which it is registered” and it “must provide sufficient indication of all of these factors in order to prove genuine use. Failure to fulfil one of the conditions will lead to the evidence of use being rejected as insufficient“. In light of the foregoing, the evidence put forward by McDonald’s was found to be insufficient, in particular as McDonald’s did not produce any evidence of actual sales of products or any commercial transaction under the “BIG MAC” trademark.

In particular, affidavits are statements of the parties and are given less weight unless the content is supported by other means of evidence, which should originate from an independent source. With regard to the advertising material it has to be demonstrated nature and extent of the distribution. Websites need to show place, time and extent of use, e.g. that it has been accessed (e.g. records relating to internet traffic and hits) and/or orders have been placed through it. Wikipedia entries can be amended by users at any time, so that they are not a reliable source of information.

According to the EUIPO McDonald’s had not proven genuine use of the “BIG MAC” trademark for any of the goods and services for which it is registered, the application for revocation was successful and the contested trademark has to be revoked in its entirety.

McDonald’s still has a right to appeal against this decision, whereas the notice of appeal must be within two months of the date of its notification.

However, McDonald’s is owner of further trademarks, inter alia “GRAND BIG MAC” (EU 016 485 674) in class 30 for edible sandwiches or the trademark “BIG MAC” in classes 29, 30, 43 (EU 017 305 079) both filed in 2017.

So that it must be considered, that the dispute between McDonald’s and Supermac’s is far from being settled.

Further Information:


Share post



most read


Highlights

MLL Legal

MLL Legal is one of the leading law firms in Switzerland with offices in Zurich, Geneva, Zug, Lausanne, London and Madrid. We advise our clients in all areas of business law and stand out in particular for our first-class industry expertise in technical-innovative specialist areas, but also in regulated industries.

MLL Meyerlustenberger Lachenal Froriep

Newsletter

Much is still unclear in relation to liability questions around AI tools.

Read our latest post about “Liability during the Lifecycle of an AI Tool” and download our white paper.

Show article.

Our Story

MLL Legal is a leading Swiss law firm with a history that dates back to 1885. The firm has grown both organically and by means of strategic mergers, the latest of which took place on 1st July 2021 between Meyerlustenberger Lachenal and FRORIEP.

The merger establishes MLL Legal, a combined new entity as one of the largest commercial law firms in Switzerland with 150 lawyers in four offices in Switzerland and two offices abroad, in London and Madrid serving clients seeking Swiss law advice.

Our firm has a strong international profile and brings together recognised leadership and expertise in all areas of law affecting commerce today, with a focus on high-tech, innovative and regulated sectors. 

About us

Publications

Click here for our latest publications

COVID-19

Read all our legal updates on the impact of COVID-19 for businesses.

COVID-19 Information

Job openings

Looking for a new challenge?

Our talented and ambitious teams are motivated by a common vision to succeed. We value open and straightforward communication accross all levels of the organisation in a supportive working environment.

Job openings

Firm News

Click here for our latest firm news.

Our Team

The regulatory and technological landscape continually require businesses to adapt and evolve.
Our 150+ lawyers are continuously innovating and striving for improvement in everything they do. We embrace new ideas and technologies, combining our wealth of expertise with creative thinking and diligence. With our hands-on approach, we implement viable solutions for the most complex legal challenges.

Our Team.

LexCast – the podcast series by MLL NexGen

Smart legal education on the go. The LexCast hosted by MLL NexGen provides legal insights in a short format that allows listeners to educate themselves on and about legal issues wherever they are and whenever they find the time.

Listen to our podcast series – stay tuned.

MLL Legal on Social Media

Follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter und Instagram.