The Importance of Governance in Building Ecosystems


Your contact

Wirecard has proven once again that stellar growth and stunning revenues do not always mean that a company is well-founded. Although the board of directors has responsibilities towards the shareholders and the latter have certain information rights, organisational failure and mismanagement often remain unnoticed until it’s too late. Additional corporate governance laying down the fundamentals on management and organisation is therefore vital for long-term success, to ensure that the checks and balances among the stakeholders involved (shareholders, founders, and employees) are appropriate.

Good corporate governance is not only relevant for traditional equity financing, but also for alternative ways of funding, in particular for projects aiming at creating new decentralised ecosystems by using distributed ledger technology. Contributors in DLT-projects very often provide funding without getting any rights similar to shareholders in a stock corporation. The relationship is mainly based on trust and is very fragile. Organisational failures or mismanagement by the project founders often result in delays of the planned project, or even a partial or total loss of the funding provided, and leave the contributors without any rights of control or legal remedies.

It is necessary that the governance models are looked at more closely and discussed more widely. In the following, we will be presenting a decentralised community-enabling governance model #decenGov for DLT-ecosystem projects by using a Swiss association acting as the core of the ecosystem.

PCIR-Allocation

An association is operated by its bodies. Swiss association law offers great flexibility in defining bodies and allocating rights and obligations for each body. In contrast to committees that are usually created by the board, bodies are an independent instance and are free to act within the powers allocated to them in the articles of association.

By law, an association must have at least a board, the general assembly, and auditors (if required by law because of exceeding the mandatory thresholds), which, however, are not sufficient for DLT-projects from a governance perspective. To manage the responsibility towards the participants of the ecosystem and to have well-balanced powers, we recommended creating expert circles as additional bodies e.g. treasury, membership admission, governance & nominations, ethics, technology, or grants & projects. Once the bodies have been defined, the rights and responsibilities for each body must be defined. For this, the PCIR-model can be useful, as it separates the power to propose, consult, implement, and review (PCIR). Implementing the PCIR-model helps to make sure that each body’s actions are always perceived and verified.

Remote Voting

Appropriate governance, however, requires more than just introducing different bodies. Bodies only make sense if they are appropriately represented when decisions are rendered. Participants in ecosystems for DLT-projects are oftentimes located all around the world. Physical meetings are in particular not useful for the general assembly. The same applies to live phone or video conferences because of the different time zones in which participants reside. To ensure that the general assembly is adequately represented by the members of the association, it is key to include in the articles of association the concept of remote voting (Urabstimmung) and the applicable majority requirements. The former obliges the board to send invitations out to the members within due time and grant them a right for counterproposals before the remote voting process opens. Without having remote voting explicitly included in the articles of association, the general assembly can only render decisions in writing by unanimity.

Balanced Voting

If voting rights in the general assembly of the association are represented by cryptographic tokens and multiple of tokens entitle to multiple votes (not one-person-one-vote), it is recommended to include a mechanism to overcome the vulnerabilities of traditional voting mechanisms such as insignificance of individual but highly bought-in voters, tyranny, excessive vote-buying and failing to give proportional weight to association members’ interests. A possible approach is the use of quadratic voting. Quadratic voting is a method of collective decision-making that strives to find a middle ground between one-person-one-vote and one-token-one-vote systems.

Majority Requirements

The flexibility of the Swiss association law allows the creation of very flexible or rigid structures by defining majority requirements for decisions by the association’ bodies. The higher the thresholds, the more bodies that must be involved, the less likely it becomes that the association will deviate from the original purpose. In case of full rigidity, the association structure becomes very similar to a foundation, with the main difference, however, that the association members together with the other bodies (as the case may be according to the articles) keep a final say. A Swiss association structure based on the #decenGov model is therefore perfectly working as a steering vehicle for DLT-projects to ensure sustainable development of the respective ecosystems in a democratically, well-balanced, and decentralised manner.

Information:

#decenGov is a model developed by the HOPR Association together with FRORIEP. If you want to learn more about #decenGov, please get in touch with us.


Share post



most read


Highlights

MLL Legal

MLL Legal is one of the leading law firms in Switzerland with offices in Zurich, Geneva, Zug, Lausanne, London and Madrid. We advise our clients in all areas of business law and stand out in particular for our first-class industry expertise in technical-innovative specialist areas, but also in regulated industries.

MLL Meyerlustenberger Lachenal Froriep

Newsletter

Much is still unclear in relation to liability questions around AI tools.

Read our latest post about “Liability during the Lifecycle of an AI Tool” and download our white paper.

Show article.

Our Story

MLL Legal is a leading Swiss law firm with a history that dates back to 1885. The firm has grown both organically and by means of strategic mergers, the latest of which took place on 1st July 2021 between Meyerlustenberger Lachenal and FRORIEP.

The merger establishes MLL Legal, a combined new entity as one of the largest commercial law firms in Switzerland with 150 lawyers in four offices in Switzerland and two offices abroad, in London and Madrid serving clients seeking Swiss law advice.

Our firm has a strong international profile and brings together recognised leadership and expertise in all areas of law affecting commerce today, with a focus on high-tech, innovative and regulated sectors. 

About us

Publications

Click here for our latest publications

COVID-19

Read all our legal updates on the impact of COVID-19 for businesses.

COVID-19 Information

Job openings

Looking for a new challenge?

Our talented and ambitious teams are motivated by a common vision to succeed. We value open and straightforward communication accross all levels of the organisation in a supportive working environment.

Job openings

Firm News

Click here for our latest firm news.

Our Team

The regulatory and technological landscape continually require businesses to adapt and evolve.
Our 150+ lawyers are continuously innovating and striving for improvement in everything they do. We embrace new ideas and technologies, combining our wealth of expertise with creative thinking and diligence. With our hands-on approach, we implement viable solutions for the most complex legal challenges.

Our Team.

LexCast – the podcast series by MLL NexGen

Smart legal education on the go. The LexCast hosted by MLL NexGen provides legal insights in a short format that allows listeners to educate themselves on and about legal issues wherever they are and whenever they find the time.

Listen to our podcast series – stay tuned.

MLL Legal on Social Media

Follow us on LinkedIn.